Uncategorized
Brooklyn

History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme: VC William Peng

A local VC puts his thoughts down in what he's looking for in founders to invest in and reveals something about the psyche of investors.

William Peng's Twitter Photo

Investors recognize patterns. The introspective ones put effort into making sure they’re following the right ones.

Williamsburg based venture capitalist William Peng, a partner in Red Swan Ventures, just might be one of those.

“Red swans,” according to the company’s webpage, are ventures that are successful despite the fact that no one saw them coming.

Before turning VC, Peng helped to design Drop.io before it was acquired by Facebook and has written about how he’s making picks for Red Swan.

At Red Swan, instead of having a list of checkboxes we pattern-match to, we have a framework of an iconic entrepreneur in mind, which we aspire to, both in ourselves as well as in the founders we back.

We believe that these founders correlate highly with movements that have large followings of passionate people (customers, employees, investors, advisors) who would follow them to the ends of the earth.

Red Swan has made some strong picks, including ecommerce apparel company Bonobos, eyeglasses fashion firm Warby Parker and Center City Philadelphia-based business analytics business RJ Metrics.

That perspective lead to another post by Peng: history does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme. Using formulas to make the final decision about an investment can be worrisome, he said. Instead, he argues that the final winnowing should be done more by a process than any sort of rigorous evaluation tool:

At the core of venture capital decision making is pattern matching. But the paradox of venture capital is that the same pattern matching that helps you identify winners can also pigeonhole your decision making into unoriginal, non-power law groupthink.

Pattern matching as a decision making process needs a corollary as a more satisfactory explanation for pattern matching.

And he gives some interesting examples of tests for breaking an investor out of their own set of preconceptions, such as the $20 Starbucks Test (if anyone ever does this, please let us know about your experience) and problematizing the whole notion that similar ventures compete based on matching each other in the basics and then, somewhere, upping the game.

Companies: RJMetrics / Warby Parker

Before you go...

Please consider supporting Technical.ly to keep our independent journalism strong. Unlike most business-focused media outlets, we don’t have a paywall. Instead, we count on your personal and organizational support.

3 ways to support our work:
  • Contribute to the Journalism Fund. Charitable giving ensures our information remains free and accessible for residents to discover workforce programs and entrepreneurship pathways. This includes philanthropic grants and individual tax-deductible donations from readers like you.
  • Use our Preferred Partners. Our directory of vetted providers offers high-quality recommendations for services our readers need, and each referral supports our journalism.
  • Use our services. If you need entrepreneurs and tech leaders to buy your services, are seeking technologists to hire or want more professionals to know about your ecosystem, Technical.ly has the biggest and most engaged audience in the mid-Atlantic. We help companies tell their stories and answer big questions to meet and serve our community.
The journalism fund Preferred partners Our services
Engagement

Join our growing Slack community

Join 5,000 tech professionals and entrepreneurs in our community Slack today!

Trending
Technically Media