The Philadelphia Police Department doesn’t film its interrogations, but some legal and civil rights experts say that’s a mistake.
“There is absolutely no reason with our technology why we we are not videotaping every confession,” said civil rights attorney David Rudovsky on WHYY’s Radio Times last month. The thought here is it’d curb coerced, confused or ill-be-gotten confessions by allowing defense attorneys to later see how their clients offered up culpability.
It’s common practice in several big cities, including New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington, D.C., the Philadelphia Daily News recently reported. So what’s stopping Philadelphia?
Philadelphia police spokesman Lt. John Stanford said Police Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey supports recording interrogations, just as he did as chief of police in Washington, D.C. The department is in the “infancy stages” of working with the city and others on a new policy for recording interrogations that will spell out how suspects and witnesses are to be treated, Stanford said.
But logistics, money and a state law that requires that permission be obtained from those being recorded are hampering the department’s goal, he said.
“It’s not as easy as throwing a camera in a room. There are a lot of logistics that have to be worked out,” Stanford said.
Join our growing Slack community
Join 5,000 tech professionals and entrepreneurs in our community Slack today!
Donate to the Journalism Fund
Your support powers our independent journalism. Unlike most business-media outlets, we don’t have a paywall. Instead, we count on your personal and organizational contributions.

When global tech association CompTIA spun off its nonprofit arm, the TechGirlz curriculum went dark

Real or cake? How AI confuses baking — and what bakers wish you knew

Biotech startup BioLattice wins pitch prize — but says the real value was showing up
