How should cities measure the success of their open data program?
In a recent blog post, Chief Data Officer Mark Headd made a case against using sheer volume as a metric. Quality, he suggested, is more important.
While data sets on library hours and SEPTA schedules are valuable, he wrote that cities should also be dedicated to releasing data focused on enhancing government transparency, like the the Philadelphia Police complaint data set and the geographic markets used for the city’s property reassessments.
It’s heartening to know that Headd believes this should be a priority of Philadelphia’s open data program, despite the fact that transparency-focused releases “can take longer to realize and require much more effort to achieve.”
But Headd has never been the hold up his year in City Hall. The question is if he can get the rest of the city on the same page.
Read the whole blog post here.
Join our growing Slack community
Join 5,000 tech professionals and entrepreneurs in our community Slack today!
Donate to the Journalism Fund
Your support powers our independent journalism. Unlike most business-media outlets, we don’t have a paywall. Instead, we count on your personal and organizational contributions.

National AI safety group and CHIPS for America at risk with latest Trump administration firings

The good news hiding in Philly’s 2024 venture capital slowdown

How women can succeed in male-dominated trades like robotics, according to one worker who’s done it
