Civic News

No more SBA 8(a) checkboxes — for now

Black, Indigenous and other Small Business Act-designated socially disadvantaged contractors participating in the SBA 8(a) supplier diversity program have been asked to submit narratives explaining why they're disadvantaged.

Say goodbye to checking a box for supplier diversity programs. (Photo by Pexels user Tara Winstead via a Creative Commons license)

A wrench was thrown into the works at the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) after a federal judge in Tennessee ruled that it could no longer consider race in its 8(a) program — an initiative designed to help socially disadvantaged contractors obtain federal contracts.

The SBA’s certification portal has temporarily stopped accepting applications for certification. No more checking the box, at least for now.

Here’s a breakdown of what you need to know at this stage.

What is SBA 8(a)?

Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act authorizes the SBA to establish a business development program that help firms owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.

Technically, 8(a) is not race-based, because economically disadvantaged individuals can be any race (including white) and economically disadvantaged white people can apply and make the case that they qualify.

Socially disadvantaged people, on the other hand, are defined by the Small Business Act as “individuals who have been subjected to racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias within American society because of their identities as members of groups and without regard to their individual qualities and the social disadvantage must stem from circumstances beyond their control.”

Individuals who fall under that definition by the SBA are Black Americans, Native Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Pacific Americans and Subcontinent Asian Americans — basically anything but non-Hispanic white.

The Tennessee case

And this is where the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee took issue. Simply put, the judge ruled that it’s not enough to be a certain race or ethnicity to be considered socially disadvantaged. All applicants should have to make their case as to why they’re socially disadvantaged on an individual level, while removing systemic racism as an automatic factor.

The case followed the June Supreme Court reversal of affirmative action at colleges and universities, disallowing higher education institutions from considering race as a factor for admissions.

While new 8(a) applications have been suspended, current 8(a) participants have been asked to submit a narrative statement explaining why they are disadvantaged if they weren’t required to previously. Other than the temporary notices on its 8(a) portal, the SBA hasn’t disclosed more than that, but it has until Sept. 17 to file an appeal.

Companies: U.S. Small Business Administration

Before you go...

Please consider supporting Technical.ly to keep our independent journalism strong. Unlike most business-focused media outlets, we don’t have a paywall. Instead, we count on your personal and organizational support.

Our services Preferred partners The journalism fund
Engagement

Join our growing Slack community

Join 5,000 tech professionals and entrepreneurs in our community Slack today!

Trending

Trump may kill the CHIPS and Science Act. Here’s what that means for your community.

Election results: Live updates on presidential, Senate, House and PA races

Technical issues at the polls hit Pennsylvania, county extends voting hours

14 tech community events to be thankful for in November

Technically Media