Why the bar for women founders is so high when it comes to fundraising - Technical.ly Philly

Growth

Apr. 23, 2021 11:05 am

Why the bar for women founders is so high when it comes to fundraising

"The minute you raise your seed round, it's time to start thinking about your Series A," one VC said.
Clockwise, from top left: Pam Kostka of All Raise, Anu Duggal of Female Founders Fund and Susan Lyne of BBG Ventures.

Clockwise, from top left: Pam Kostka of All Raise, Anu Duggal of Female Founders Fund and Susan Lyne of BBG Ventures.

(Screenshot)

The pandemic has set the clock back for many aspects of women’s advancement toward professional equality — wages and promotions were lost, parenting largely fell to mothers and millions more women than men lost their jobs in the mass layoffs and furloughs.

And while entrepreneurs saw pretty normal (even great, in Philly) venture capital deals last year, women made up a very small percentage.

“The news was not good,” said Pam Kostka, CEO of All Raise, the national org focused on boosting gender diversity in VC, during a panel on funding women founders during Comcast and LIFT LabsFunding Summit Wednesday.

Out of all VC deals last year, 2.2% went to exclusively women-founded companies, Kostka said, and only 12.2% went to mixed-gender teams. It’s a “backslide” for women founders, she said.

Still, female founders didn’t miss a beat during the pandemic, said Susan Lyne, cofounder and managing partner of BBG Ventures. They still raised $5 billion, she pointed out, and the best thing founders can do is recognize that there is capital out there.

“I think spending too much time on the negatives is not going to do anybody a lot of good,” she said. “We have to do that, but I don’t think female founders should be doing that.”

Along with the pandemic, the racial justice movement will certainly impact the way venture capitalists are deploying funds, Kostka said. Black women entrepreneurs received less than 1% of overall VC funding since 2018.

Advertisement

The numbers are not surprising, said Anu Duggal, founding partner of Female Founders Fund. The venture ecosystem is largely driven by limited partners, she added, and if they’re not the ones driving change within VC, it will be tough to see it come to light. The more women who you see leading successful companies — like Whitney Wolfe Herd and the Bumble IPO or Anne Wojcicki and 23andMe’s IPO — live as examples.

“Where it tends to get harder is late-stage,” Duggal said. “If you look at the typical late-stage fund, you don’t really see a lot of women or diversity at all. And so I don’t think that impact of pushing more diversity at those later-stage growth funds has happened yet. You need to have diversity of thought in order for people to see out of their box.”

Indeed, the later-stage funding has been more difficult for women founders. In 2020, just 10 of the 120 new unicorn companies had a woman founder. About 8% of women-founded companies got a seed deal in 2020, but only about 2% got a later-stage deal, Crunchbase found.

Lyne’s advice?

“The minute you raise your seed round, it’s time to start thinking about your Series A,” she said.

It’s where women founders tend to run into a lot of problems, she said. You can’t wait until it’s time to start raising capital to meet with VCs. If your seed round will get you 18 months of runway, start meeting and talking to investors now, and actually begin your fundraising 15 months from now.

And, investors have to believe that every investment has the potential to be a real winner — instead of explaining what you’re building right now, sell them on why your idea will be a billion-dollar one a few years from now, Lyne added.

And women investors may be in the unique position to identify opportunities early that investors who are men may miss. (Note: fertility startup Stix’s $3.5 million raise announced this week.) In their first and second fund, Duggal said, there were companies in the astrology, mental health and beauty fields that other VCs weren’t going for that ended up providing a huge ROI.

And there are so many areas in the last year alone that have proved for great business solutions — healthcare, education, work-from-home collaboration tools — that will make great companies.

“That is an inherent advantage, when you’re competing against hundreds of funds and you can recognize consumer behavior shifting,” Duggal said. “I think that sets you up to have a different lens and to be able to identify different opportunities.”

Check out more coverage from the Funding Summit with this recap of Cleo Capital Managing Director Sarah Kunst’s talk on how founders can find success in their markets.

-30-
CONTRIBUTE TO THE
JOURNALISM FUND

Already a contributor? Sign in here
Connect with companies from the Technical.ly community
New call-to-action

Advertisement

Sign-up for daily news updates from Technical.ly Philadelphia