Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile USA have agreed to a spectrum exchange, but the deal has gotten consumer advocates and the communications workers’ union up in arms, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported last week.
While the deal would improve T-Mobile’s service in cities like Philadelphia and allow the carriers to use use their own spectrum more efficiently, critics say that the spectrum exchange, which includes a co-marketing campaign with Comcast, could hurt consumers and workers by making the market less competitive. More details from the Inquirer below:
The consumer group Public Knowledge and the Communications Workers of America both said the Verizon-T-Mobile deal should not alleviate broader objections that critics have raised, especially about what CWA policy director Debbie Goldman called a “monopolistic cross-marketing arrangement,” under which Verizon and Comcast would market each other’s services.
“The threat of job loss and higher consumer prices from the proposed Verizon Wireless-Big Cable deal remains,” Goldman said. [more]
The agreement is subject to approval by the Federal Communications Commission, but the Inquirer reports that approval seems likely.
For more context on the deal, check out this CNET article.
Join our growing Slack community
Join 5,000 tech professionals and entrepreneurs in our community Slack today!
Donate to the Journalism Fund
Your support powers our independent journalism. Unlike most business-media outlets, we don’t have a paywall. Instead, we count on your personal and organizational contributions.

You've heard the term 'valuation' on 'Shark Tank.' What does it actually mean?

From B2B to B2C — the storytelling shift economic development needs now

Seeking out authentic connections can help female founders land more investments
