Civic News
Municipal government / Transportation

Gov. Wolf squashes ridesharing beef with stroke of pen

Pennsylvania's ridesharing wars are over. Here's a look back at our coverage.

Gov. Wolf signs the ridesharing legislation into law. (Courtesy photo)

The final episode in the long-standing conflict between ridesharing companies and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania had very little drama.
On Friday morning, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf signed into effect Senate Bill 984, effectively making rideshare services legal across the state.


Both app-based giants in the space, Uber and Lyft, chimed in on Friday, thanking the local authorities for clearing the legislative path for their business across the state.
“The passage of a permanent framework for ridesharing increases modern transportation options and economic opportunity across the state,” Lyft Public Policy Manager Sami Naim said in an emailed statement. “It also ensures Philadelphia’s children and their public schools will benefit from additional funding generated from ridesharing revenue.”
The organization thanked Wolf, the state legislature and Pennsylvania supporters for the approval of the bill.
Uber also sent out an email thanking authorities and riders in the state. “The biggest thank you goes to riders like you,” the company wrote. “Whether you sent an email, called your elected officials or signed our petition, you made a big difference.”
And now that Uber has the stamp of approval, the company announced it was expanding the service to 10 counties across the state.
“Beginning at 5 p.m. today [Friday, Nov. 4], Uber will be available to 100% of Pennsylvanians, providing access to affordable rides and flexible work opportunities for tens of thousands,” spokesperson Craig Ewer told Technical.ly in an emailed statement.
https://twitter.com/Uber_Philly/status/794557126920249348
It was a long fight, as you may have read in our past coverage, which goes all the way back to when East Coast ridesharing pioneer Sidecar was still kickin’.
Here are some of the memorable moments of Philly’s ridesharing wars:
2013: The Philadelphia Parking Authority (PPA), a state agency, made Sidecar illegal (the Silicon Valley startup, whose first East Coast expansion market was Philadelphia, is not to be confused with the Philly ecommerce company also named Sidecar). Sidecar, the ridesharing company, later shut down.
2014: It was announced Uber was operating in Philly, but we found out UberX had actually been running super quietly in the Philly suburbs for months. By the end of the year, a report by the Inquirer suggested there wasn’t enough consensus in the state legistature to update laws and allow companies to operate.
2015: Lyft made a splash in Philly — defiantly so — with the PPA saying it would fine any drivers $1,000 if they caught them. A Daily News investigation revealed that the PPA was actively trying to keep UberX illegal in Philly. Josh Kopelman, early investor in Uber through First Round Capital, had a few words to say.
2016: In July, with the Democratic National Convention rolling into town, Uber and Lyft were allowed to operate for a short period of time by way of a budget agreement, but as the date neared for the end of that deal, the PPA announced it would be sanctioning drivers (not riders) the minute the truce was over. Then all hell broke loose, with a cease and desist order from the Court of Common Pleas forcing companies to shut down and a lightning fast injunction from the Commonwealth Court reversing that order. Which brings us to today, when the last chapter of the story was written.
Rideshare on, Pennsylvania.

Companies: Lyft / Philadelphia Parking Authority / Uber
Engagement

Join the conversation!

Find news, events, jobs and people who share your interests on Technical.ly's open community Slack

Trending

How venture capital is changing, and why it matters

What company leaders need to know about the CTA and required reporting

The ‘Amazon of science stores’ and 30 other vendors strut their stuff for Philly biotech

Why the DOJ chose New Jersey for the Apple antitrust lawsuit

Technically Media