Squareknot's $300K saga - Technical.ly Philly

Business

Nov. 14, 2014 10:29 am

Squareknot’s $300K saga

Every raise is a story. This is how one startup, a “Github for things,” landed early-stage capital from all Philly-area investors — despite being told to head west.

Jason Rappaport, CEO and founder of Squareknot.

(Photo by Juliana Reyes)

Squareknot was broke.

It was spring 2014 and the startup, which bills itself as a Github for making things in real life, had run through all its funding: $500,000 from Center City’s Gabriel Investments and $30,000 of founder Jason Rappaport’s personal money. There was a promise of $1 million from an investment firm with local ties, but it had fallen through.

“We had been planning everything around that million,” said Rappaport, 24.

He had hired six people on the promise of that money, signed their offers, given them start dates and now, he had to tell them those jobs didn’t exist anymore. As for his existing four-person team, he told them that their next paycheck would be their last. Nobody quit.

Heartened, Rappaport gave himself an ultimatum. He’d hit the local investor circuit, try his damnedest to raise money and if he didn’t, he’d call it quits.

What follows is a story about what it takes to raise early-stage investment in this town. Namely, a prominent champion or two, momentum and some naïveté. We’ll spoil this part: Rappaport raised a modest $300,000 exclusively from local investors and is on track to launch a public beta this month. But how he did it? That’s the more compelling story.

###

First, Rappaport lowered his expectations.

He had been aiming for a million-dollar raise from big-name venture capital firms. But he realized that a venture capital firm wasn’t going to make a big bet on a startup they didn’t know at all. His new goal? A $250,000 round backed by angels.

Then he started making the rounds, pitching to local investors at Delaware Crossing Investor Group, Robin Hood Ventures and Benjamin Franklin Technology Partners.

Advertisement

It was after the Delaware Crossing pitch that things changed.

Rappaport was on the train to New York City with his girlfriend — they were going to a live taping of the Rachael Ray Show — when he got the email.

What are you doing in Philly? the email said. You’re not a Philly company, you’re a Silicon Valley company.

squareknot

The latest version of Squareknot. (Screenshot via squareknot.com)

The sender was Paul Martino, a Silicon Valley investor who splits his time between the West Coast and his home in Doylestown. Martino sold his First Round Capital-backed adtech company Aggregate Knowledge for $150 million to Neustar last fall.

When he called Squareknot a “Silicon Valley company,” he meant a direct-to-consumer startup with a huge potential audience. A potential user base so big that it didn’t need to figure out how to make money just yet. “You don’t see a lot of those deals coming out of Philly,” he said in a phone interview this week.

"I want Squareknot to do to Philly what Tumblr did for New York."
Squareknot CEO Jason Rappaport

In his email, Martino said he had seen Rappaport pitch at Delaware Crossing and wanted to introduce him to some Silicon Valley VCs.

Martino worked fast. By the time Rappaport got off the train in New York, most of the meetings had been set.

At that point, Rappaport said, “I’m just, like, kind of freaking out.”

One minute you’re pitching Philadelphia angels and the next you’re shipping off to Silicon Valley. (But first, you’re watching Rachael Ray.)

###

Right before Rappaport left, First Round Capital’s Josh Kopelman invited him in for a pitch.

While Squareknot was in a funding bind, Rappaport’s CFO, the precocious and impeccably-styled Raheem Ghouse, had submitted an application to StartUp PHL, the city’s early-stage investment fund run by First Round Capital.

Rappaport pitched to Kopelman and Ben Cmejla, Kopelman’s operations manager who helps run StartUp PHL, at the firm’s University City office. (Full disclosure: Technical.ly rents space in this office.) As Rappaport remembers, Kopelman didn’t seem that into it.

Raheem Ghouse, CFO of Squareknot, in the company’s Center City office. (Photo by Juliana Reyes)

There was also the uncomfortable moment that followed after Rappaport name-dropped the Silicon Valley investors he was going to meet with.

Kopelman told him: Never show that list again because I’m going to call them all up.

“Great,” Rappaport said.

###

The Silicon Valley trip morphed from a few days into a few weeks.

In May and June, Rappaport pitched to prominent venture capital firms and angel groups, headed to San Francisco for Maker Faire and had a burger with a big name Chicago restaurateur who was in town. All this had been set into motion by those first introductions from Martino, whom Rappaport met with in Silicon Valley. (Rappaport asked us not to name the people he met with on the West Coast since none of them made any funding commitments to Squareknot.)

Rappaport, a North Jersey kid who graduated from Lehigh University and practically radiates with enthusiasm, was like a kid in a candy shop — except one filled with Silicon Valley glitz instead of gum drops.

But by the end of the trip, he still hadn’t raised any money. Time was running out.

squareknot 2

Squareknot’s “branches.” (Screenshot via squareknot.com)

It didn’t make sense to him.

Many of the investors he met with seemed really excited about the company, a Wikipedia-like crowdsourced guide to making and doing things that takes cues from Github’s “branches.” But they all said the company was “too early.” And they all kept asking about Kopelman. Was he going to invest?

If Josh Kopelman hasn't invested in your Philly startup, 'it can be a black cross on you.'

“He has this monopoly over Philly investing,” Rappaport said.

It felt like, if he wasn’t going to invest in Squareknot, no one else would. (Rappaport’s not the first to say that. One Center City entrepreneur, among others, said that if Kopelman hasn’t invested in your Philly startup, “it can be a black cross on you.”)

Rappaport was working with Martino and Gabriel Investments’ Richard Vague, the one investor that had already bet on Squareknot (he also gave the company a small cash infusion during the Silicon Valley trip). Other than that, Squareknot had exhausted all its options. (Martino’s venture firm, Bullpen Capital, focuses on Series A investments, so Squareknot was “a round too early,” he said. He is, however, a Squareknot advisor with a stock grant.)

Then Rappaport got the email from Kopelman. He wanted to talk.

###

Kopelman was in.

Squareknot would be one of the first investments made by the StartUp PHL angel fund, a new city-backed fund that could invest in startups that weren’t quite ready for the city’s seed fund. The company would get $100,000.

A blur of investment, sparked by Kopelman's imprimatur.

Now, Rappaport could tell everyone Kopelman was investing, in hopes of turning that $100,000 into $250,000 or more.

The next month was a blur of investment. The money kept rolling in, from Benjamin Franklin Technology Partners, from Delaware Crossing Investor Group, from Clutch CEO Ned Moore and Verilogue president Jeff Kozloff.

The apex was a swanky, investor-only party at Martino’s house in Doylestown, where Martino said Rappaport would raise the rest of the money he needed. Rappaport and Ghouse were the only non-investors there. The pair studied the list of investors who would be there, doing “extensive backgrounds” on each one. Tech scene veteran and Morgan Lewis attorney Steve Goodman, who had taken a shining to Rappaport, helped with talking points, as did Martino, Vague and Gabriel Investment’s Holly Flanagan.

It worked.

squareknot devs

Squareknot developers (l-r) Ian Stewart, Olajide Osanyingbemi and Michael Henderson. (Photo by Juliana Reyes)

The whirlwind ended with $300,000 in the bank for Squareknot. Rappaport said he’s eyeing $200,000 more. It’s not Silicon Valley money, but it’s enough, for now.

His team of nine, a mix of full- and part-time employees, is plugging away at the company’s bright Center City office, on the 25th floor of 1735 Market Street, right next to cloud optimization startup Cloudamize and Vague’s Governor’s Woods Foundation.

Rappaport, who moved to Philly from Allentown almost two years ago, couldn’t be happier. It’s not just because his company got a second chance. It’s because that chance is here in Philly.

“If no one in Philly had invested in us and the city had let us down, we would’ve moved,” he said. “But now, we get to stay here.”

Squareknot has about 160 users in its private beta, including local maker Peterson Goodwyn, who uses it to post how-to guides for his products, and one civic hacker who used Squareknot to demo at a hackathon. The latest version will launch later this month to the public, with invite code access.

###

Rappaport hopes it can be that consumer-facing startup that makes tech people pay attention to Philly, a town of business-to-business models and more niche consumer-facing companies, like SnipSnap and DuckDuckGo.

“I want Squareknot to do to Philly what Tumblr did for New York,” he said.

He followed that up at a press conference for StartUp PHL this week, flanked by Kopelman and Mayor Michael Nutter, in the city’s new Innovation Lab: “When you look at a lot of other cities that have eventually grown huge, awesome startup communities, there’s always one great consumer-facing company that pops up and makes everyone interested in that location, and, although I don’t know if Squareknot will be it, we sure damn well have to try.”

-30-
Juliana Reyes

Juliana Reyes became Technical.ly's editorial product lead after reporting on the Philadelphia tech scene for four years. She's co-president of the Asian American Journalists Association Philadelphia chapter and a two-time Philadelphia News Award winner for "Community Reporting of the Year." The Bryn Mawr College grad lives in West Philly, likes her food spicy and wears jumpsuits often.

  • John

    So Kopelman is the king maker for the whole city? Not very promising. Sounds a lot more like the old “you have to know a guy to get anything done” model instead of the open modern tech tech scene we hope for.

    • mark

      it’s naive to think someone is writing a big check without some
      assurance that another person has vetted you. we’re lucky philly has
      kopelman to be that guy. we need more of them sure, but other cities
      would lie, cheat and steal to get first round there. dont dismiss that

  • geoffd

    These kinds of ransom note statements really bother me:

    “If no one in Philly had invested in us and the city had let us down, we would’ve moved,”

    I think there is value in committing to a place first. Assuming that people or cities owe you something is pretty selfish and short-sighted.

    • I think a better way I could have said it was that we would’ve *had* to move, because the only options for funding would’ve been outside the city. I was frequently told to move Squareknot to Silicon Valley by Silicon Valley people with Silicon Valley money, but was super adamant that the company remain in Philly.

      Philly doesn’t owe us – or anyone – anything. But I believe that building a thriving startup community is a two-way street. Companies have to want to be in Philly, and local investors need to want to fund those companies.

      Squareknot was successful, but too many great local companies that deserve capital aren’t. That’s why I got so excited about the StartupPHL Angel Fund, because it’s the first step to Philly’s investment scene becoming less of an exclusive club and more of an incubator for starting great companies.

      • geoffd

        I don’t agree with this idea that “too many great local companies… deserve capital”.

        That is a value judgement that is indicative of bubble thinking. What is the metric you are using to divine “deservedness”?

        We all know that capital for low probability start-ups is more closely related to people buying lottery tickets and hoping to win big.

        I believe that businesses play an important role in the fabric of any city – large or small, great or struggling. However, I would prefer to spend my energy applying metrics of fairness and deservedness to social justice and other deeply human issues before worrying about how many high risk investment opportunities exist for wealthy people in a particular city.

Advertisement

Sign-up for regular updates from Technical.ly

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!