How should cities measure the success of their open data program?
In a recent blog post, Chief Data Officer Mark Headd made a case against using sheer volume as a metric. Quality, he suggested, is more important.
While data sets on library hours and SEPTA schedules are valuable, he wrote that cities should also be dedicated to releasing data focused on enhancing government transparency, like the the Philadelphia Police complaint data set and the geographic markets used for the city’s property reassessments.
It’s heartening to know that Headd believes this should be a priority of Philadelphia’s open data program, despite the fact that transparency-focused releases “can take longer to realize and require much more effort to achieve.”
But Headd has never been the hold up his year in City Hall. The question is if he can get the rest of the city on the same page.
What is open science?
Meet the 17 people tasked with advising Philly on smart city best practices
If elected, this 26-year-old scientist could bring a STEM voice to City Council
Why Deacom’s team prioritizes collaboration and continuous improvement
Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation gets $100K to ease access to childhood cancer data
Breaking: Philadelphia is restructuring its Office of Open Data and Digital Transformation
5 on-ramps to the world of open data
Engineers have Vistar Media’s Philly office all to themselves
Sign-up for daily news updates from Technical.ly Philadelphia