How should cities measure the success of their open data program?
In a recent blog post, Chief Data Officer Mark Headd made a case against using sheer volume as a metric. Quality, he suggested, is more important.
While data sets on library hours and SEPTA schedules are valuable, he wrote that cities should also be dedicated to releasing data focused on enhancing government transparency, like the the Philadelphia Police complaint data set and the geographic markets used for the city’s property reassessments.
It’s heartening to know that Headd believes this should be a priority of Philadelphia’s open data program, despite the fact that transparency-focused releases “can take longer to realize and require much more effort to achieve.”
But Headd has never been the hold up his year in City Hall. The question is if he can get the rest of the city on the same page.
Code for Philly’s monthlong, civic engagement-focused hackathon returns this September
Government social is the broccoli of the internet
The Philly courts website is finally back up
Why this dev planted roots at The Philadelphia Inquirer after starting her career abroad
What Data Jawn taught us about the opioid crisis, City budgets and cartoons
The office that oversees the City’s tech teams is in transition
This month in Technical.ly history: The evolution of OpenDataPhilly
Meet these 10 hiring companies at Super Meetup
Sign-up for daily news updates from Technical.ly Philadelphia