How should cities measure the success of their open data program?
In a recent blog post, Chief Data Officer Mark Headd made a case against using sheer volume as a metric. Quality, he suggested, is more important.
While data sets on library hours and SEPTA schedules are valuable, he wrote that cities should also be dedicated to releasing data focused on enhancing government transparency, like the the Philadelphia Police complaint data set and the geographic markets used for the city’s property reassessments.
It’s heartening to know that Headd believes this should be a priority of Philadelphia’s open data program, despite the fact that transparency-focused releases “can take longer to realize and require much more effort to achieve.”
But Headd has never been the hold up his year in City Hall. The question is if he can get the rest of the city on the same page.
Why the Digital Literacy Alliance’s third grant round is all about the 2020 census
The Philly revenue department’s data-driven strategy to upend city bureaucracy
What is open science?
Why working with the University City Science Center was a game changer for 4 Philly startups
If elected, this 26-year-old scientist could bring a STEM voice to City Council
Most Philly stores can’t go cashless, new law says
Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation gets $100K to ease access to childhood cancer data
Take a peek at the opportunities popping up at PromptWorks
Sign-up for daily news updates from Technical.ly Philadelphia