We need to talk about why Jocelyn Harper left Girl Develop It - Technical.ly Delaware

Dev

Oct. 3, 2018 2:08 pm

We need to talk about why Jocelyn Harper left Girl Develop It

The Wilmington chapter leader made the choice after revelations that the nonprofit organization had not fully addressed racism concerns.

Jocelyn Harper.

(Courtesy photo)

Jocelyn Harper (who goes by @soandsos on Twitter), became chapter leader of Girl Develop It Wilmington last April. If you follow her on social media, you may have noticed a surprising tweet on Sept. 25, seemingly out of the blue:

Then, that evening, a followup:

It’s true. Harper confirmed to Technical.ly that she has chosen to separate from Girl Develop It, a national nonprofit headquartered in Philadelphia “dedicated,” its mission states, “to providing affordable, judgment-free opportunities for adult women to learn software development.”

The reason she stepped down has to do with race and feminism and the way organizations deal with being called out, she says. And we need to talk about it, because Black women are often not heard, even in spaces created to be safe for women.

“What was annoying about the situation was how vague it was,” said Harper, who spoke with Technical.ly soon after she resigned. “All of the details around the situation are very vague, and are being purposely kept vague by [GDI] headquarters. It’s very odd to me that they won’t say what specifically happened.”

The controversy didn’t start in Wilmington, but in Minneapolis, where a young Black technologist named Lanice Sims posted a fed-up Twitter thread in August (you can read the whole thread here):

Advertisement

Four days later, the Girl Development Minneapolis Twitter account responded:

It would be a full month before Harper, or most chapter leaders heard about it.

“My thing is that it wasn’t brought to the chapter leaders’ attention until it kind of came to a head,” Harper told Technical.ly. “It wasn’t of HQ’s own volition to actually tell us about it. ”

The catalyst came with a Sept. 19 Medium post titled “Reflecting on my time as a GDI Minneapolis Chapter Leader” by Amy Gebhardt. Gebhardt had spent a lot of time on self-reflection since Sims’ tweets, and she goes into great detail about how she felt and the process that led her to realize that she had, in fact, contributed to the racist environment Sims had called out.

Gebhardt wrote:

My hope and intent is to share failures so that other leaders — locally and nationally — can understand some of the things that went wrong here in Minneapolis. I want to challenge all of those currently involved in this organization to read this, reflect on their own experiences, and create a plan for doing better. I hope they can follow through and make necessary changes so that Girl Develop It’s mission can thrive in all 63 of the cities they are currently in. Change, starting from the HQ team, must happen in order for GDI to have positive impacts on its local communities.

Gebhardt’s post caused a stir with GDI chapter leaders, many of whom were convening at a conference the same weekend.

“Another chapter leader made a Slack channel to discuss issues,” Harper said. “For me, I don’t like the fact that this happened a couple of months ago and we’re just now hearing about it. And there was a lot of discussion happening between chapter leaders, but no Black women were actually saying anything. We don’t have a lot of Black chapter leaders.”

She continued: “[The Slack discussion] took the issue of race out of the equation. Somebody that is guilty of something wrote an article and referenced another article about ‘white supremacy in heels‘ — you can’t try to solve the issue by removing race entirely.”

By Monday, the thread had died down, but Harper was still bothered by it. She read to us what she posted to the chapter leaders’ Slack channel:

Is this still being discussed? Because I find most of the reactions in the discussion surrounding this removing that fact that the person who voiced her concern was in fact a Black woman. […] Also, saying that Chapter leaders will be going through inclusion and diversity training is broad. What specifically is going to be taught so that, as in this case, a white woman won’t marginalize a Black woman when she is in a position of power? I think this interaction goes past just diversity and inclusion training and I sincerely hope that it is not a blanket statement from HQ to appease us for the time being without giving details on a course of action.

To boil it down, Harper wanted the leadership to do something besides promises of diversity training and a sense that the organization would take a long-range “there is a lot of work to do” approach to inclusion, which generally hasn’t worked well for women of color.

She said the response she received expressed appreciation for her comments, but left her unsatisfied.

“It was still a non-committal non-answer that’s still not recognizing what happened,” she said. “I support GDI’s mission statement, but as a Black woman it does not align with my beliefs. It came down to: Would I want to stay through that? How mentally taxing would that be? How is GDI vetting these chapter leaders? What else is there? What worries me most is that this just the one issue that we’ve heard about,” Harper said.

She posted her resignation the next day.

“I want to apologize to Jocelyn and to all of the people of color in our community who have not felt heard or supported,” GDI Executive Director Corinne Warnshuis said in a written statement to Technical.ly. “I’m sad to see Jocelyn go, since I think right now we need voices like hers in our community the most. I regret that our organizational culture (stemming in part from our lack fully-formed policies and systems) allowed for any member, specifically women of color, to feel unsafe or unsupported.”

As for how the organization is responding? Warnshuis wrote:

I’m hopeful that we can rebuild the trust of our members and supporters by taking actionable steps to live up to our mission and values. We’ve started to take some of those steps immediately over the past few weeks, including creating anonymous feedback channels, revising our Code of Conduct and Harassment Policy, revamping the chapter leader onboarding process, and engaging short- and long-term consultants to support us in these important next steps.

For now, Harper is concentrating on her job as a software developer at Capital One (she was formerly with O3 World in Philadelphia). She will be a panelist at the Delaware Innovation Week event Women in Innovation, presented by Women in Digital on Nov. 8.

Now, a question to readers: Why is it so difficult to talk about race? Can situations like these be averted with an open dialogue?

Want more richly researched and deeply sourced community reporting?  Become a Technical.ly member for $12 per month -30-
JOIN THE COMMUNITY, BECOME A MEMBER
Already a member? Sign in here

Advertisement

Why Ivan Thomas and Zach Phillips are Wilmington’s Dream Team

realLIST: These are the top 10 startups in Newark, Del.

Greenville firm works to empower young women

SPONSORED

Delaware

Join our Technical.ly Match beta, an opt-in alternative to recruiting

Wilmington, DE

CSC

Business Analyst

Apply Now
Wilmington DE

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Hadoop, Big Data Associate

Apply Now
Wilmington DE

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

VP, Kafka Software Engineer

Apply Now

What these technologists of color would tell their younger selves

Meet 11 of Delaware’s up-and-coming technologists of color

Great Dames pitch competition to feature $25,000 prize package

SPONSORED

Delaware

Win up to $360,000 in funding at the WeWork Creator Awards

Wilmington DE

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

BI Developer

Apply Now
Kennett Square, PA

Chatham Financial

Software Developer in Test

Apply Now
Kennett Square, PA

Chatham Financial

User Experience Designer

Apply Now

Sign-up for daily news updates from Technical.ly Delaware

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!