Civic News

Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, as creators and communities brace for impact

Influencers have been preparing for a pivot ever since Congress passed the law, which some feel is fueled by xenophobia.

The US Supreme Court in April 2024 (Sameer Rao/Technical.ly)

The United States’ top court today upheld the controversial TikTok ban, forcing millions of Americans to face the reality that a major source of livelihood and information might vanish. 

The Supreme Court’s decision to sustain a law banning one of the world’s most popular social media platforms unless Chinese parent company ByteDance sells it by Sunday follows months of political turmoil, as well as worry and confusion for people who depend on the app.

“I would lose 440,000 followers and four years worth of content and memories,” Pittsburgh-based creator Joe Long, who has 450k followers as @joelongtok, told Technical.ly in December.

Justices determined that the ban, which President Joe Biden signed into law in April with bipartisan support, would not violate the First Amendment and was needed to address security concerns. 

“There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community,” the court’s opinion reads. “But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok’s data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary.”

read the court’s full opinion

TikTok responded to the court’s decision by threatening to “go dark” on Sunday if the Biden administration didn’t offer assurances that US companies like Apple and Google wouldn’t be punished for continuing to host the platform on their devices. (The law itself mandates an end to TikTok app store downloads and upgrades in the US, but not use of the service for current users.)

Ban supporters cite concerns for national security, user wellness 

Beyond free speech concerns, the response to the ban has illuminated deep divisions around how Americans view social media, multinational tech companies, the People’s Republic of China and data privacy. 

Many of the law’s proponents argued that the Chinese government could threaten US national security by using the platform to collect user data and influence content. As part of a common arrangement among China-based companies, a Chinese government-owned investment fund has a 1% stake in ByteDance’s main Chinese subsidiary.

People like Rep. Mike Gallagher, a Wisconsin Republican who co-sponsored the bill to ban TikTok in the House of Representatives, referenced the Chinese government’s reported espionage, propaganda and surveillance of journalists to justify the law.

“If TikTok continues to establish itself as the dominant news platform in America and if the algorithm remains a black box and subject to the control of ByteDance and, by extension, the Chinese Communist Party,” Gallagher said in an interview with The New York Times, “you’re placing the control of information — like what information America’s youth gets — in the hands of America’s foremost adversary.” 

TikTok, for its part, told NBC News it abides by local laws in the areas where it operates. 

Proponents of the law have also cited its harmful impact on young people, especially children barraged by algorithm-driven content.

 A study from the digital security-focused Security.org found that 50% of surveyed parents thought a federal ban would make children safer

While TikTok has defended its child safety protocol and tools, documents made public through a lawsuit from 14 states’ attorneys general indicated the company was aware of and not addressing issues related to the app’s impacts on children’s mental health.  

Opponents lambast economic and social impacts of TikTok restrictions

The effort to ban TikTik faced tremendous opposition from users, creators and others. One persistent theme revolved around how US-based social media and tech companies did not face comparable prohibitions despite having similar issues

Numerous critiques, lawsuits and studies have accused Silicon Valley juggernauts like Meta, YouTube and X of susceptibility to foreign influence campaigns, harming children’s well-being, enabling extremism, misusing user data, and facilitating authoritarianism and genocide. Yet none of these companies have been targeted with bans in the US, critics say. 

“We should be investigating all social media companies about privacy issues and bad state actors abusing platforms,” said Cynthia Choi, the executive director of the advocacy group Chinese for Affirmative Action. “Not just TikTok.”

Choi, like many Asian Americans, also criticized the law as playing into long-standing xenophobic “yellow peril” narratives, in which anything associated with East Asia is turned into a threat. 

Such narratives have enabled anti-Asian violence throughout US history, from attacks on Chinatowns during the 1800s to assaults on Asians during the Covid-19 pandemic. Choi referenced how Sen. Tom Cotton spent a child safety hearing repeatedly questioning TikTok’s Singaporean CEO Shou Chew’s citizenship.

For creators, while TikTok isn’t the biggest form of income across the field, it does provide substantial business opportunities. 

Influencers that specialize in content for their local communities previously told Technical.ly that their jobs provide unique opportunities to connect with small entrepreneurs. Plus, a lot of creators, even if they aren’t big on TikTok, said they use ByteDance-owned CapCut as an editing tool, which would also be banned under the act. 

“TikTok provides people an opportunity with a smaller following to earn money on lives and selling stuff in the shop,” said Bill Stiteler, a Pittsburgh content creator who goes by @saxboybilly18. “People make money on there in the wildest way, it’s led to sales creativity.”

Still, creators said, it’s the loss of community that they fear the most. 

The Pew Research Center found that most American adults under 30 use the platform, constituting 62% of its over 170 million US-based users. The institution also found that while most Americans believe it threatens national security, those who do tend to skew older and more conservative than the generations that use it the most. 

These critiques have already hurt the ban’s credibility in the eyes of many TikTok users, reflected in the emergence of satirical “My Chinese Spy” memes as users head to platforms like RedNote — an unofficial name for Xiaohongshu, another platform based in China

How the incoming Trump administration could change things

Without a sale, the ban would go into effect on Sunday, Jan. 19, and get delisted from app stores under threat of fines against their host companies.

The ban would also be implemented one day before President-elect Donald Trump officially takes office. The incoming leader has already indicated that he may abandon the Biden administration’s hardline stance. 

For instance, his amicus brief in this case asked the Supreme Court to delay the ban’s implementation date so he could negotiate a solution balancing national security issues with user rights.  

During his last term, though, Trump cited national security concerns when unsuccessfully trying to get the app banned. He has also courted support from leaders of tech companies that stand to benefit from TikTok’s exit.

Engagement

Join our growing Slack community

Join 5,000 tech professionals and entrepreneurs in our community Slack today!

Donate to the Journalism Fund

Your support powers our independent journalism. Unlike most business-media outlets, we don’t have a paywall. Instead, we count on your personal and organizational contributions.

Trending

What internet speed do you really need?

How DC protesters are protecting themselves online while calling out the Trump administration

Baltimore-area libraries are a gold mine of resources for entrepreneurs

Developing tech for government agencies? Participant advisory councils can help get it right.

Technically Media