Civic News
Crime / Municipal government / Public safety

Despite saying she’ll veto bill, mayor wants body cameras for police

City Council moved forward with legislation that would equip cops with cameras to record all interactions with the public — but Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake vowed to spike it. She says she has a better plan.

Police in Baltimore may be wearing something like this soon. (Photo courtesy of American Civil Liberties Union of Washington)

The Baltimore City Council approved a measure that would require all police officers to wear body cameras while on duty, but don’t expect to see the cameras in action anytime soon.
That’s because Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said shortly after City Council’s Monday night hearing that she will veto the two-page bill.
In simple language, the bill requires that all Baltimore city cops “be personally equipped with a digital audio-and-video portable recording device.” No further technical specifications or stipulations are spelled out, but the legislation requires the camera program to be phased in over one year.
The mayor’s move comes as no surprise to those who follow City Hall politics. She already telegraphed a veto threat, and the city’s solicitor called the bill illegal.
But Rawlings-Blake is hoping one message doesn’t get lost in the headlines: She still wants body cameras.

Rawlings-Blake wants to appoint a working group to study the legislation further. City Solicitor George Nilson has also argued that the bill violates a provision of the city charter that makes it illegal for Council to give direct orders to the police department.
With more and more police departments across the country beginning to use them, body cameras have been talked about in Baltimore for more than a year. But the move to film officers gained new urgency after the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., and a Baltimore Sun report that shined a light on millions of dollars the city has paid to settle police brutality lawsuits out of court.
In September, Baltimore police investigated two police brutality cases in a two-week span. In one case, Officer Vincent Cosom repeatedly punched a man in the face at a bus stop. The incident was caught on a Citiwatch camera and Cosom was later charged. In another case, a group of five officers were seen on camera beating and tasing a man outside a Greenmount Avenue bar. While videos of both incidents came to light on cellphone and city-owned crime cameras, police-worn body cameras would likely have produced better footage.
Tara Richards, an assistant professor at the University of Baltimore School of Criminal Justice, said a body camera program “provides the opportunity for transparency in officer-citizen interactions and gathers valuable information that can be used to protect both parties in cases of potential wrongdoing.”

Companies: Baltimore City Council / Baltimore Police Department / City of Baltimore

Before you go...

Please consider supporting to keep our independent journalism strong. Unlike most business-focused media outlets, we don’t have a paywall. Instead, we count on your personal and organizational support.

Our services Preferred partners The journalism fund

Join our growing Slack community

Join 5,000 tech professionals and entrepreneurs in our community Slack today!


Welcome to Camp Apple Intelligence

Find out what type of heat wave you’re really in for with NOAA’s HeatRisk dashboard

Baltimore Money Moves: Howard County cyber company lands $150M Series D

How AI can revolutionize education's quest for truth

Technically Media